Most leaders believe that a strategy should be broad enough to inspire yet specific enough to guide action. But here’s the paradox: The broader a strategy is, the less guidance it provides. The more specific it is, the less strategic it feels.
This paradox is why many leaders hesitate to make their strategies specific, fearing that too much detail will limit flexibility, stifle innovation, or oversimplify complexity. However, a strategy that is too broad is just as dangerous as one that is too rigid. When goals are vague, teams lack the clarity needed to align their efforts, measure progress, and execute effectively.
For example, an organisation I was consulting for had a goal to “grow revenues by 20%”. While this set a target, it lacked clarity on where and how the growth would happen. Some business areas were in a maturity stage with limited growth potential, while others were in a high-growth phase. Without specificity, teams in mature business areas struggled to align with this goal, making execution ambiguous.
The Key to Clear, Specific & Measurable Strategy
Fortunately, there’s a way to make any goal clear and specific enough to guide action. Instead of "grow revenues by 20%," we translated this goal into two clear performance results:
This simple shift rendered the strategy more actionable, measurable, and easier to align with—facilitating focused efforts, relevant performance measures, and a direct connection between strategy and execution.
Managing the Broad AND Specific Strategy Paradox
To manage the Broad AND Specific Strategy Paradox, leaders must create a balance in the language they use in their strategies. It’s important to recognise that:
A well-defined strategic goal must be: